Jacob Mchangama General Counsel of the bourgeois-liberal think tank Cepos and former lawyer in a large Danish law firm. Jacob has in addition to his Master. floating lanterns Jur a Masters Degree in Human Rights and Democratisation and has been an active commentator in the print and electronic media on human rights and rule of law.
Berlingske floating lanterns want to ensure that the debate on b.dk kept in a proper tone that makes it inspiring and challenging for everyone to contribute and participate. We are looking for like clear, sharp, attitudinal strong post with great breadth and diversity and critical look at the case. But we do not accept messages that are blatantly floating lanterns libelous, racist, personally demeaning. Such posts will henceforth be deleted. The same applies to posts that do not bear the full and correct name of the sender, which contain floating lanterns abbreviated names, fictitious or false names. We encourage all debaters to make editorial note posts that do not follow these guidelines. The editors.
Since 11 September 2001, Denmark and many other Western countries prioritized national security of virtually floating lanterns all other interests. There has been drastic measures and interventions in the freedoms and the rule of law. But it is as if, in some parts of the West is spreading an understanding that nothing is gained by sacrificing much of his freedom floating lanterns and the rule of law. The West's open society must necessarily stick to its basic principles. It is noteworthy that both Obama and McCain had as election promises to close Guantanamo and ban torture. Obama said it even more clearly in his inaugural address:
We reject that our common defense is a choice between our safety and our ideals. floating lanterns Our country's founding fathers, faced with perils that we can scarcely imagine. They formed a foundation for the rule of law and human rights. A foundation floating lanterns that was developed through the blood of generations. Those ideals still light the world, and we will not give them up for the sake of convenience.
In the UK there are also catching on a realization that the Labour government has gone to great lengths to sacrifice British floating lanterns hævdvunde freedoms. I was recently in London for the launch of the very interesting book "The Assault on Liberty". The book documents include how national security has been consistently used to undermine the rights of all Britons for centuries have taken for granted. What is interesting is that the book is written by Dominic Raab, an adviser to the Conservative Party's shadow Home Secretary. The preface is written by the former Conservative shadow floating lanterns home secretary David Davis, who resigned from his post in protest floating lanterns against the Labour government's attempt to introduce the possibility of 42-day detention of terror suspects. In other words, the book is an expression of a principle based conservative criticism of the state's increasingly drastic measures in freedoms. A criticism which has undoubtedly contributed to the Conservatives leading large over Labour in the polls. But even in Labour seem to track a certain remorse for its sale of British heritage. The British Foreign Secretary, David Miliband, thus took away from the "war on terror" in a startling comment in which he emphasized floating lanterns that the rule of law must not be trampled upon in efforts to counter terrorism.
There is no evidence that the most intrusive parts of terrorist floating lanterns packages will be changed. On the contrary, wants to spread terror floating lanterns package IIs expanded access to wiretapping for gang crime, despite the fact that this access initially only introduced because they considered it imperative to combat international terrorism. Tuneserloven is another example of that security trumps freedom, regardless of the law in part was unnecessary to control people who do pose a danger to national security, and was unnecessarily onerous for persons who do not pose such a threat. It is also noteworthy floating lanterns that there would a Supreme Court decision to get the government to realize it obviously untenable that makes decisions on deportation based on terrorist suspects floating lanterns without access to justice. When it comes to monitoring of Danish citizens, we are in the situation where the defense minister refuses to say whether Defence Intelligence uses the Law on Defence to conduct secret surveillance of Danes without a court order. Monitoring, which could result in the creation of secret records that can be shared with PET.
Also when it comes to matters other than terrorism legislation is the government's rule of law approach questionable. There have never been so many laws and rules that give the public access to private property without a court order. This despite the fact that the government had an ambition to strengthen the Constitutional protection of privacy. The Government
No comments:
Post a Comment