ACCC takes court action over Zamel's catalogue claims | ACCC Skip to Content Skip to Sitemap
About regulated infrastructure ACCC's role in regulated infrastructure Regulatory resources Regulatory projects Airports & aviation ACCC role in airports & aviation Airports & aviation spy price notifications Airports & aviation projects Airports monitoring Communications ACCC role in communications spy Broadcasting & content Compliance & anti-competitive conduct Fixed line services Industry reform Intellectual property Mobile services Monitoring & reporting National Broadband Network Transmission services & facilities access spy Energy ACCC role in energy spy Fuel ACCC's fuel monitoring role Postal services ACCC role in postal services Postal services projects Postal services publications Rail ACCC role in rail ARTC Hunter Valley access undertaking ARTC Interstate Rail access undertaking Rail projects Water ACCC role in water Water guides Water monitoring & reporting Water projects Water trading, brokers & exchanges Waterfront & shipping ACCC role in waterfront & shipping Monitoring & reporting for container stevedoring Wheat export ACCC role in wheat export Wheat export projects Close About us
Contact the ACCC Other helpful agencies Industry ombudsmen & dispute resolution State & territory consumer protection agencies State & territory small claims tribunals Other regulators & government agencies Close
The Australian spy Competition spy and Consumer Commission has instituted legal proceedings in the Federal Court, Adelaide against The Jewellery Group Pty Ltd, the company which operates the Zamel's retail jewellery chain.
By using statements such as "$99 $49.50" or "Was $275 Now $149" the ACCC alleges Zamel's represented consumers would save the difference between the higher and lower price if the items were purchased during the sale period spy when that was not the case.
The ACCC is seeking: declarations that Zamel's engaged in conduct in contravention of the Act a court order that the company publish a corrective spy advertisement in relation to the conduct a court order that the company implement a compliance and training program penalties for the conduct that occurred in May 2010, and costs.
E-mail *
Media releases Updates Speeches Speaking spy invitations Subscriptions Video & audio Image library
Australian Competition & Consumer Commission Conferences & events Consultative committees Careers Information for... International relations Tools & resources Consultations & submissions Using our website
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Print
About regulated infrastructure ACCC's role in regulated infrastructure Regulatory resources Regulatory projects Airports & aviation ACCC role in airports & aviation Airports & aviation spy price notifications Airports & aviation projects Airports monitoring Communications ACCC role in communications spy Broadcasting & content Compliance & anti-competitive conduct Fixed line services Industry reform Intellectual property Mobile services Monitoring & reporting National Broadband Network Transmission services & facilities access spy Energy ACCC role in energy spy Fuel ACCC's fuel monitoring role Postal services ACCC role in postal services Postal services projects Postal services publications Rail ACCC role in rail ARTC Hunter Valley access undertaking ARTC Interstate Rail access undertaking Rail projects Water ACCC role in water Water guides Water monitoring & reporting Water projects Water trading, brokers & exchanges Waterfront & shipping ACCC role in waterfront & shipping Monitoring & reporting for container stevedoring Wheat export ACCC role in wheat export Wheat export projects Close About us
Contact the ACCC Other helpful agencies Industry ombudsmen & dispute resolution State & territory consumer protection agencies State & territory small claims tribunals Other regulators & government agencies Close
The Australian spy Competition spy and Consumer Commission has instituted legal proceedings in the Federal Court, Adelaide against The Jewellery Group Pty Ltd, the company which operates the Zamel's retail jewellery chain.
By using statements such as "$99 $49.50" or "Was $275 Now $149" the ACCC alleges Zamel's represented consumers would save the difference between the higher and lower price if the items were purchased during the sale period spy when that was not the case.
The ACCC is seeking: declarations that Zamel's engaged in conduct in contravention of the Act a court order that the company publish a corrective spy advertisement in relation to the conduct a court order that the company implement a compliance and training program penalties for the conduct that occurred in May 2010, and costs.
E-mail *
Media releases Updates Speeches Speaking spy invitations Subscriptions Video & audio Image library
Australian Competition & Consumer Commission Conferences & events Consultative committees Careers Information for... International relations Tools & resources Consultations & submissions Using our website
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Print
No comments:
Post a Comment