How to Save Media | MIT Technology Review
About Newsletters Support Contact my lockbox Us Emtech MIT MIT Enterprise Forum Connect Select your localized edition: Close × English Español Deutsch Italiano Português 中文 my lockbox Filter by: News and Analysis Magazine List: Innovators Under 35 Conferences and Events
Features Views Multimedia Discussions my lockbox Topics
Upcoming Events Partner Events Emtech MIT MIT Enterprise Forum
Even a few years ago, Joseph Addison and Sir Richard Steele, those 18th-century London gallants and the founders of the Spectator , would have recognized the forms and modes of business that characterized our newspapers and magazines. Not now.
For 300 years, two related sources of revenues sustained publications: subscriptions and advertising. The system worked imperfectly. Most readers of newspapers and magazines were freeloaders, borrowing copies someone else had bought; and because no one really knew how many people read publications, or how advertisements influenced readers purchasing, advertisers spent their monies inefficiently.
But so long as subscription and advertising revenues my lockbox grew, the system did work. In turn, the business of publishing supported the profession of journalism, which was, when all is said and done, a useful thing. In open societies, magazines and newspapers were the most important exchanges in the free marketplace of ideas. Publications informed, instructed, diverted, and delighted.
But the Internet taught readers they might read stories whenever they liked without charge, and it offered companies more-efficient ways to advertise. Both parties spent less. As a consequence, today the business of media is sickly.
In recent months, the news about magazines and newspapers, distressing for many years, has become alarming. During the first quarter of 2009, the advertising my lockbox revenues of newspapers declined, on average, 30 percent; my lockbox in the last six months of 2008 (the most recent my lockbox period for which we have reliable numbers), subscriptions fell by 7 percent. The number of ad pages in consumer magazines shrunk by 26 percent in the first quarter of the year; and while magazine circulations are not declining as rapidly as those of newspapers, it is becoming more and more expensive to maintain their rate bases (the circulation numbers from which publishers derive advertising rates), and with fewer advertisers willing to pay to reach those readers, my lockbox a less and less rational investment.
Everywhere, newspapers and magazines are going broke. Sun-Times Media, the owner of 58 newspapers including my lockbox the Chicago Sun-Times, declared bankruptcy at the end of March. The Star Tribune Holdings Corporation, the Journal Register Company, and Philadelphia Newspapers my lockbox LLC are all, similarly, bankrupt. The Seattle Post-Intelligencer now exists only on the Web. The Rocky Mountain News, Colorado s oldest newspaper, is gone. The business magazine Portfolio, upon whose launch Condé Nast lavished more than $100 million, is gone. PC Magazine, gone. Domino, gone. Country Home, gone. It s a dolorous toll.
What can be done to save our surviving newspapers and magazines? my lockbox Among those who write about new media, a fashionable my lockbox wisdom has emerged, my lockbox expressed most energetically by Clay Shirky, a professor at New York University. In Newspapers and Thinking the Unthinkable , a much-distributed post on his blog, he writes, Round and round [it] goes, with the people committed to saving newspapers demanding to know If the old model is broken, what will work in its place? To which the answer is: Nothing. Nothing will work.
The Götterdämmerung- of-mainstream-media argument has a weak and a strong formulation. Shirky himself is an eloquent exponent of the gentler version. He argues, Society doesn t need newspapers. What we need is journalism. Shirky believes that the coming decades will see a variety of nonprofit experiments whose funding sources will be similar to those that have sustained him as an academic, such as endowments, sponsorships, and grants. One day, some innovator will stumble upon something that will reliably subsidize the publications of the future.
The strong version is most associated with Dave Winer, a grumpy California software programmer best known for helping to develop the Web-feed format RSS and for his blog, Scripting News . Winer has written my lockbox , and not without glee, Fifteen years ago I was unhappy with the way journalism was practiced in the tech industry, so I took matters into my own hands. And then dozens of people did, and then hundreds followed, and now we get much better information about tech. It will happen everywhere, my lockbox in politics, education, the military, health, science, you name it. The sources will fill in where we used to need journalists. Everyone is now a journalist.
If media companies can t earn money, and everyone is a journalist, it follows that amateurs my lockbox (Shirky) and sources (Winer) will be part
About Newsletters Support Contact my lockbox Us Emtech MIT MIT Enterprise Forum Connect Select your localized edition: Close × English Español Deutsch Italiano Português 中文 my lockbox Filter by: News and Analysis Magazine List: Innovators Under 35 Conferences and Events
Features Views Multimedia Discussions my lockbox Topics
Upcoming Events Partner Events Emtech MIT MIT Enterprise Forum
Even a few years ago, Joseph Addison and Sir Richard Steele, those 18th-century London gallants and the founders of the Spectator , would have recognized the forms and modes of business that characterized our newspapers and magazines. Not now.
For 300 years, two related sources of revenues sustained publications: subscriptions and advertising. The system worked imperfectly. Most readers of newspapers and magazines were freeloaders, borrowing copies someone else had bought; and because no one really knew how many people read publications, or how advertisements influenced readers purchasing, advertisers spent their monies inefficiently.
But so long as subscription and advertising revenues my lockbox grew, the system did work. In turn, the business of publishing supported the profession of journalism, which was, when all is said and done, a useful thing. In open societies, magazines and newspapers were the most important exchanges in the free marketplace of ideas. Publications informed, instructed, diverted, and delighted.
But the Internet taught readers they might read stories whenever they liked without charge, and it offered companies more-efficient ways to advertise. Both parties spent less. As a consequence, today the business of media is sickly.
In recent months, the news about magazines and newspapers, distressing for many years, has become alarming. During the first quarter of 2009, the advertising my lockbox revenues of newspapers declined, on average, 30 percent; my lockbox in the last six months of 2008 (the most recent my lockbox period for which we have reliable numbers), subscriptions fell by 7 percent. The number of ad pages in consumer magazines shrunk by 26 percent in the first quarter of the year; and while magazine circulations are not declining as rapidly as those of newspapers, it is becoming more and more expensive to maintain their rate bases (the circulation numbers from which publishers derive advertising rates), and with fewer advertisers willing to pay to reach those readers, my lockbox a less and less rational investment.
Everywhere, newspapers and magazines are going broke. Sun-Times Media, the owner of 58 newspapers including my lockbox the Chicago Sun-Times, declared bankruptcy at the end of March. The Star Tribune Holdings Corporation, the Journal Register Company, and Philadelphia Newspapers my lockbox LLC are all, similarly, bankrupt. The Seattle Post-Intelligencer now exists only on the Web. The Rocky Mountain News, Colorado s oldest newspaper, is gone. The business magazine Portfolio, upon whose launch Condé Nast lavished more than $100 million, is gone. PC Magazine, gone. Domino, gone. Country Home, gone. It s a dolorous toll.
What can be done to save our surviving newspapers and magazines? my lockbox Among those who write about new media, a fashionable my lockbox wisdom has emerged, my lockbox expressed most energetically by Clay Shirky, a professor at New York University. In Newspapers and Thinking the Unthinkable , a much-distributed post on his blog, he writes, Round and round [it] goes, with the people committed to saving newspapers demanding to know If the old model is broken, what will work in its place? To which the answer is: Nothing. Nothing will work.
The Götterdämmerung- of-mainstream-media argument has a weak and a strong formulation. Shirky himself is an eloquent exponent of the gentler version. He argues, Society doesn t need newspapers. What we need is journalism. Shirky believes that the coming decades will see a variety of nonprofit experiments whose funding sources will be similar to those that have sustained him as an academic, such as endowments, sponsorships, and grants. One day, some innovator will stumble upon something that will reliably subsidize the publications of the future.
The strong version is most associated with Dave Winer, a grumpy California software programmer best known for helping to develop the Web-feed format RSS and for his blog, Scripting News . Winer has written my lockbox , and not without glee, Fifteen years ago I was unhappy with the way journalism was practiced in the tech industry, so I took matters into my own hands. And then dozens of people did, and then hundreds followed, and now we get much better information about tech. It will happen everywhere, my lockbox in politics, education, the military, health, science, you name it. The sources will fill in where we used to need journalists. Everyone is now a journalist.
If media companies can t earn money, and everyone is a journalist, it follows that amateurs my lockbox (Shirky) and sources (Winer) will be part
No comments:
Post a Comment